Category Archive: Cost Reduction

Enterprise Edition versus Standard Edition

There is no doubt that Enterprise Edition Database offers superior functionality that many applications and administrators shan’t live without. I wrote about this nearly two years ago when UNIX manufacturers started dropping prices and core counts increased across all chip types, including IBM Power7.

Well, I recently created a financial comparison between Enterprise and Standard that seemed worth sharing. It bears repeating that Standard Edition is license-able on servers with a maximum capacity of four sockets. To my knowledge, Oracle has not limited the total number of cores across those four chips (since it licensed per chip), nor hamstrung Standard Edition under the hood to under-utilize all available cores.

In my example, consider 400 cores across 10 servers, each with 4 10-core chips. Licensed as Enterprise Edition, this would total nearly $10M in list licensing. If, instead, we deploy Standard Edition on four of those servers, our list licensing is just shy of $6M. Either deal is huge and would be awarded a discount of at least 65%, so we can extrapolate that deploying Standard Edition on 40% of those 400 cores saves about $3.3M over a five-year time frame.

I’m just sayin’.

Introducing the Oracle Costimizer Beta Program

I’m looking for beta testers of software that helps organizations reduce the cost of running Oracle.

The Oracle Costimizer is inspired by the reality that most organizations struggle to manage their Oracle assets effectively, let alone set themselves on a path towards savings. Does that remind you of your own organization?

Features of the “Costimizer” include automated compliance analysis, financial modelling of alternative deployments and maintenance renewal discount analysis. It is 100% web-based, cross-browser and drag-and-drop enabled. Both deployment and CSI data may be uploaded via CSV file, and future-state modelling is enabled via the Oracle product catalog and SPECint results for server comparisons.

Please contact me directly for more details on how to participate.

Architecture and Design

It’s difficult (i.e. nearly impossible) to save money on Oracle without changing how you’ve deployed its products. License-friendly scenarios for consolidation, virtualization, high availability, disaster recover, tier-ing to Standard Edition, outsourcing, cloud, etc., must be seriously considered for future-state. This is especially true after a decade of marketing against expensive UNIX machinery towards adoption of extra-cost Enterprise Edition options designed for Lintel pizza boxes.

Oracle is smarter than to let its customers simply reshuffle annual maintenance fees, cancel/rebuy expensive contracts, negotiate multi-year support in exchange for better discounts, etc. The bottom line is that Oracle doesn’t need to offer or allow any of this. In other words, saving money on Oracle is hard work and requires someone with technical experience to create alternatives that reduce costs without risking business continuity.

Announcing Rational IT Partners

Customers don’t need anyone to help Oracle sell them more software. Quite the opposite.

First, most customers have enough database software to last forever if shown the proper optimization strategies.

Read the rest of this entry »

Skip VMware? Oracle on VMware, Part 3

I was reminded this morning that the key to saving money on software is to reduce your need for it. Said differently, executives overseeing IT spend should be asking the following question: why aren’t improvements to hardware, adoption of low-cost x86 servers, cloud computing, fill-in-the-blank-latest-whatever, resulting in overall savings?

As complex as the topic may be, there is one simple truth: vague, undocumented and otherwise overwhelmingly complex software licensing policies have the potential to dictate IT decisions.

Read the rest of this entry »

Older posts «